🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed order, the nation's top court permitted Texas to use a revised congressional boundary scheme that is projected to include as many as five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 order, issued on Thursday, grants a request by the state to set aside a federal judge's block that had invalidated the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating significant confusion and upsetting the fine balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its decision.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably grouped voters according to their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to use the districts established after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Strong Opposition

In a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's ruling. She stated that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its ruling was written by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a breach of the U.S. Constitution.

National Redistricting Fight

The ruling comes amid a nationwide contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican hold. Ordinarily, map-drawing happens after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a chain reaction among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that might create a number of more Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, for their part, have countered with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes favorable to the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

On the other hand, Democratic leaders decried the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party campaign committee.

Another senior House figure said the court had another time shredded its legitimacy by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.