🔗 Share this article

The administration has decided to remove its key measure from the workers’ rights bill, substituting the guarantee from wrongful termination from the commencement of work with a six-month qualifying period.

Industry Concerns Result in Reversal

The move follows the business secretary informed businesses at a prominent gathering that he would listen to concerns about the effects of the law change on hiring. A labor union representative remarked: “They have backed down and there may be more developments.”

Mutual Understanding Achieved

The Trades Union Congress said it was willing to agree to the negotiated settlement, after prolonged talks. “The primary focus now is to implement these measures – like immediate sick leave pay – on the official legislation so that employees can start profiting from them from next April,” its lead representative declared.

A union source added that there was a perspective that the half-year qualifying period was more practical than the less clearly specified nine-month probation period, which will now be eliminated.

Political Reaction

However, parliamentarians are expected to be alarmed by what is a direct breach of the administration’s manifesto, which had committed to “day one” security against unfair dismissal.

The recently appointed business secretary has taken over from the earlier minister, who had guided the act with the second-in-command.

On Monday, the official committed to ensuring companies would not “suffer” as a consequence of the amendments, which encompassed a prohibition on non-guaranteed hours and immediate safeguards for workers against unfair dismissal.

“I will not allow it to become zero-sum, [you] give one to the other, the other is disadvantaged … This has to be implemented properly,” he said.

Parliamentary Advance

A union source indicated that the changes had been agreed to allow the act to advance swiftly through the upper chamber, which had significantly delayed the act. It will mean the eligibility term for unfair dismissal being shortened from 730 days to 180 days.

The bill had originally promised that timeframe would be removed altogether and the government had put forward a more flexible trial phase that businesses could use as an alternative, legally restricted to nine months. That will now be eliminated and the legislation will make it not possible for an worker to file for unfair dismissal if they have been in position for under half a year.

Labor Compromises

Unions insisted they had achieved agreements, including on costs, but the move is anticipated to irritate leftwing parliamentarians who considered the employee safeguards act as one of their main pledges.

The legislation has been modified repeatedly by other party members in the second chamber to accommodate primary industry requests. The secretary had said he would do “all that is required” to overcome procedural obstacles to the bill because of the upper house changes, before then discussing its implementation.

“The corporate perspective, the views of employees who work in business, will be considered when we examine the specifics of implementing those key parts of the worker protections legislation. And yes, I’m talking about non-guaranteed work agreements and first-day entitlements,” he said.

Opposition Reaction

The critic called it “another humiliating U-turn”.

“The administration talk about certainty, but govern in chaos. No firm can prepare, invest or recruit with this level of uncertainty looming overhead.”

She added the act still included measures that would “harm companies and be detrimental to prosperity, and the opposition will oppose every single one. If the administration won’t scrap the worst elements of this flawed legislation, we will. The state cannot build prosperity with increasing red tape.”

Ministry Announcement

The concerned ministry announced the outcome was the result of a negotiation procedure. “The administration was happy to support these discussions and to demonstrate the benefits of working together, and continues dedicated to further consult with worker groups, industry and employers to improve employment conditions, help firms and, importantly, deliver economic growth and good job creation,” it said in a release.