🔗 Share this article Finding Amusement In the Downfall of the Conservative Party? It's Comprehensible – Yet Completely Wrong Throughout history when Conservative leaders have seemed moderately rational superficially – and alternate phases where they have come across as wildly irrational, yet were still adored by their party. This is not that situation. Kemi Badenoch didn't energize the audience when she addressed her conference, even as she offered the provocative rhetoric of migrant-baiting she assumed they wanted. It’s not so much that they’d all woken up with a revived feeling of humanity; instead they lacked faith she’d ever be in a position to follow through. In practice, a substitute. Tories hate that. An influential party member reportedly described it as a “themed procession”: boisterous, animated, but still a farewell. What Next for the Organization Having Strong Arguments to Make for Itself as the Most Accomplished Political Organization in the World? Certain members are taking renewed consideration at a particular MP, who was a hard “no” at the outset – but with proceedings winding down, and rivals has departed. Another group is generating a buzz around Katie Lam, a 34-year-old MP of the latest cohort, who looks like a countryside-based politician while filling her social media with immigration-critical posts. Is she poised as the standard-bearer to challenge the rival party, now leading the Conservatives by 20 points? Does a term exist for defeating opponents by becoming exactly like them? Moreover, should one not exist, surely we could use an expression from fighting disciplines? If You’re Enjoying Any of This, in a Schadenfreude Way, in a Serves-Them-Right-for-Austerity Way, It's Comprehensible – However Absolutely Bananas You don’t even have to look at the US to understand this, nor read Daniel Ziblatt’s seminal 2017 book, his analysis of political systems: your entire mental framework is emphasizing it. Centrist right-wing parties is the crucial barrier against the extremist factions. The central argument is that representative governments persist by keeping the “elite classes” happy. Personally, I question this as an guiding tenet. It feels as though we’ve been keeping the privileged groups for ages, at the detriment of other citizens, and they rarely appear adequately satisfied to cease desiring to take a bite out of disability benefits. However, his study goes beyond conjecture, it’s an comprehensive document review into the Weimar-era political organization during the Weimar Republic (combined with the UK Tories in that historical context). As moderate conservatism falters in conviction, as it begins to pursue the buzzwords and superficial stances of the extremist elements, it transfers the direction. We Saw Some of This During the Brexit Years The former Prime Minister cosying up to Steve Bannon was a clear case – but far-right flirtation has become so obvious now as to eliminate competing Conservative messages. Whatever became of the old-school Conservatives, who value continuity, conservation, the constitution, the national prestige on the international platform? What happened to the modernisers, who portrayed the nation in terms of economic engines, not tension-filled environments? Let me emphasize, I didn't particularly support both groups as well, but it's remarkably noticeable how such perspectives – the broad-church approach, the reformist element – have been erased, superseded by constant vilification: of newcomers, Islamic communities, social support users and activists. They Walk On Stage to Melodies Evoking the Signature Music to Game of Thrones Emphasizing positions they oppose. They characterize demonstrations by 75-year-old pacifists as “displays of hostility” and use flags – national emblems, English symbols, anything with a bold patriotic hues – as an direct confrontation to individuals doubting that complete national identity is the highest ideal a person could possibly be. There doesn’t seem to be any inherent moderation, where they check back in with core principles, their own hinterland, their stated objectives. Any stick the political figure throws for them, they’ll chase. Consequently, definitely not, it’s not fun to see their disintegration. They are dragging democratic norms along in their decline.